Photo 12 Feb 236 notes artist-confessions:

Squeedgemonster’s shark anthros made me realize how problematic the “stick an animal head and tail on a completely regular human body” anthro style was. That kind of style really limits your creativity by confining you to a very rigid set of anatomical proportions. Under those constrictive rules, it’s nearly impossible to make good, recognizable anthro designs of animals like weasels, ostriches, sharks, or any other animal where the proportions are a big part of what makes it recognizable. Would you be able to tell that the character on the right was a shark if you didn’t know beforehand?
I feel like the willingness to sacrifice human proportions (and sex appeal) for a good, recognizable design with a unique silhouette and shape to it is the difference between being a “furry artist” and a cartoonist who draws animal-based characters. I’m really glad I came across her characters. Her art isn’t bad, but these particular characters taught me a valuable lesson about stylization. submitted by -skittycatz

And let’s not forget the blaring problem with these characters SHARK TITS. SHARK HAIR. AND SHARK TITS. 

artist-confessions:

Squeedgemonster’s shark anthros made me realize how problematic the “stick an animal head and tail on a completely regular human body” anthro style was. That kind of style really limits your creativity by confining you to a very rigid set of anatomical proportions. Under those constrictive rules, it’s nearly impossible to make good, recognizable anthro designs of animals like weasels, ostriches, sharks, or any other animal where the proportions are a big part of what makes it recognizable. Would you be able to tell that the character on the right was a shark if you didn’t know beforehand?

I feel like the willingness to sacrifice human proportions (and sex appeal) for a good, recognizable design with a unique silhouette and shape to it is the difference between being a “furry artist” and a cartoonist who draws animal-based characters. I’m really glad I came across her characters. Her art isn’t bad, but these particular characters taught me a valuable lesson about stylization. submitted by -skittycatz

And let’s not forget the blaring problem with these characters SHARK TITS. SHARK HAIR. AND SHARK TITS. 

  1. s-a-b-i-e reblogged this from hills1994
  2. ragemachine666 reblogged this from queenston
  3. taiitoo reblogged this from queenston
  4. hills1994 reblogged this from queenston and added:
    Fuck, you two must have aced English in school! :P Was interesting though. :)
  5. fandomhopper reblogged this from queenston
  6. aylakurone reblogged this from queenston and added:
    I’m gonna go out on a limb here, not biased in any way of course, and say that I agree with the above two points. You...
  7. skittycatz reblogged this from squeedge and added:
    I’m going to have to disagree with you on the “people” thing—it’s very possible to have relatable “people” characters...
  8. catruko reblogged this from queenston
  9. misterindian reblogged this from queenston
  10. dendropsyche reblogged this from squeedge
  11. fhudog reblogged this from queenston
  12. peccavi-opere reblogged this from queenston
  13. lenon01 reblogged this from queenston
  14. gersty-chan reblogged this from queenston and added:
    I’m really in no position to do this but I’d like to add something. the fact that the above ponifications are...
  15. stormofthunder reblogged this from squeedge
  16. letsbethebestblogger reblogged this from becdecorbin
  17. majortechcat reblogged this from squeedge and added:
    My idol offers insight. I do find it kind of odd Squeedge doesn’t like this drawing very much when I was clamoring so...
  18. anxiousmonster reblogged this from becdecorbin
  19. becdecorbin reblogged this from queenston

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.